Skip to Main Content Library | Kent State University

Plagiarism Workshop: Home

This guides addresses plagiarism in a number of ways. Primarily it serves to educate in-coming students on what constitutes plagiarism and informs them of the policies and procedures for those students accused of acts of plagiarism.

Introduction

Plagiarism Workshop

 

This guide is designed as an educational tool for students at Kent State University to learn about plagiarism:

  • What it is
  • How to avoid doing it
  • What happens to students at Kent State when they are accused of plagiarizing
  • Where to get help and advice regarding issues related to plagiarism

It is not the intent of this guide to scare students or to simply inform them of the bad things that will happen if they are accused of academic dishonesty. While students should be aware of the consequences of getting caught plagiarizing, the purpose here is to educate students so that they have a better understanding of what constitutes plagiarism and can avoid doing it.

The workshop is divided into several parts:

  1. Observations: Students are asked questions related to how they feel (and how they think) about plagiarism within their peer group. In a classroom setting, a clicker system (student response system) is often used to compare student responses to reported studies. This guide uses polling to allow students to respond anonymously to questions.
  2. Policy and Procedure: Kent State's definition for plagiarism is introduced and a description of the policy is presented. Students walk through the process step-by-step so that they have a firm understanding of what happens to students, what the university's (instructor's) responsibiities are, and what rights students have when accused of plagiarizing.
  3. "Plagiarism School": This concept, which began on the Stark Campus in the spring of 2006, is presented. Modeled after "Traffic School" it serves to provide a means of mitigating sanctions against students accused of committing plagiarism, while also providing a way to reeducate and rehabilitate them.
  4. Avoiding Plagiarism: Practical advice is given to students along with a brief discussion on techniques they can employ while conducting research to avoid some of the pitfalls of committing plagiarism. Reference to "Double-dipping" is also made because it is part of the policy and (although technically not plagiarism) the sanctions for doing it are the same as if the student plagiarized.
  5. Case Studies: Several case studies are presented as a means for demonstrating the ways students often commit acts of plagiarism. If used in the classroom, these case studies open the door for discussing plagiarism and how these incidences might be treated according to the policy at Kent State. Students should be made aware that, while based on actual cases involving accusations of plagiarism, they are fictionalized and not a test of knowledge. Instead, polite disagreement is encouraged as a means for wider discourse on the topic.

In Class Presentation

Consequences of Plagiarism

My Profile

Staff

Melissa Bauer
Online Learning Librarian
Assistant Professor, University Libraries
330-244-3320 | Campus 53320
mbauer10@kent.edu

Theodore Guedel
Reference and Instruction Librarian
Assistant Professor, University Libraries
330-244-3322 | Campus 53322
tguedel@kent.edu

Mary Birtalan
Cataloging/Interlibrary Loan
Library Associate
330-244-3323 | Campus 53323
mbirtala@kent.edu

Brenna Schweizer
Serials/Donations
Senior Library AssistantAssistant330-244-3248
bschweiz@kent.edu