Skip to Main Content Library | Kent State University

Communication Studies: COMM 15000

Evaluating Sources and Using Library Databases for Effective Communication Research

Learning Objectives:

  1. Understand how to evaluate sources for credibility and relevance.
  2. Develop search strategies to find reliable sources using library databases.
  3. Apply SIFT evaluation criteria using hands-on activity to students’ topic.

SIFT Method

Understanding Source Evaluation: SIFT Method.  Developed by Mike Caulfield, a digital information literacy expert at Washington State University.

  • Stop: Pause and consider the information before trusting it.
  • Investigate the Source: Who is behind the information? What is the source’s purpose?
  • Find Better Coverage: Can you find the same information from more reliable or varied sources?
  • Trace Claims, Quotes and Media to Original Source: Check the original source of the information to see if it’s been accurately represented.

Group Activity

Using the SIFT method evaluate these three sources below. Group sharing – have groups briefly share one of their evaluated sources with the class, discussing why they consider it to be credible or not based on the SIFT method.

20 Scientific Reasons to Start Meditating Today | Psychology Today

Why Meditate: Meditation for Beginners - Mind Oasis

Brief, daily meditation enhances attention, memory, mood, and emotional regulation in non-experienced meditators - PubMed (nih.gov)

Library Database Search & Activity

Introduction to Library Databases: review difference between library databases and general internet searches.

Search tips for Discovery Layer. Boolean Operators.

 

Discovery at Kent State

Student Activity

Student Activity: Have students find one resource on their topic and evaluate it based on SIFT method.

Document your evaluation process:

  1. What did you investigate about your source?
  2. What coverage did you find?
  3. How did you trace the information back to original source?

Wrap Up

Class Discussion: Reflect on the process.  What challenges did you encounter? What is the most surprising thing you learned about source evaluation or using the library databases?